Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 527-538, March 2008

TGF-β1-induced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells requires pp60c-src/EGFRY845 and Rho/ROCK signaling

Albany Medical College, Center for Cell Biology and Cancer Research, MC-165, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208, USA

Received 11 October 2007; received in revised form 4 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007.

Abstract 

TGF-β1 and its target gene encoding plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are major causative factors in the pathology of tissue fibrosis and vascular disease. The increasing complexity of TGF-β1 action in the cardiovascular system requires analysis of specific TGF-β1-initiated signaling events that impact PAI-1 transcriptional regulation in a physiologically-relevant cell system. TGF-β1-induced PAI-1 expression in both primary cultures and in an established line (R22) of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) was completely blocked by inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity or adenoviral delivery of a kinase-dead EGFRK721A construct. TGF-β1-stimulated PAI-1 expression, moreover, was preceded by EGFR phosphorylation on Y845 (a src kinase target residue) and required pp60c-src activity. Infection of VSMC with an adenovirus encoding the EGFRY845F mutant or transfection with a dominant-negative pp60c-src (DN-Src) expression vector effectively decreased TGF-β1-stimulated, but not PDGF-induced, PAI-1 expression implicating the pp60c-src phosphorylation site EGFRY845 in the inductive response. Consistent with these findings, TGF-β1 failed to induce PAI-1 synthesis in src kinase-deficient (SYF−/−/−) fibroblasts and reexpression of a wild-type pp60c-src construct in SYF−/−/− cells rescued the PAI-1 response to TGF-β1. TGF-β1-induced EGFR activation, but not SMAD2 activation, moreover, was virtually undetectable in SYK−/−/− fibroblasts in comparison to wild type (SYK+/+/+) counterparts, confirming an upstream signaling role of src family kinases in EGFRY845 phosphorylation. Genetic EGFR deficiency or infection of VSMCs with EGFRK721A virtually ablated TGF-β1-stimulated ERK1/2 activation as well as PAI-1 expression but not SMAD2 phosphorylation. Transient transfection of a dominant-negative RhoA (DN-RhoA) expression construct or pretreatment of VSMC with C3 transferase (a Rho inhibitor) or Y-27632 (an inhibitor of p160ROCK, a downstream effector of Rho) also dramatically attenuated the TGF-β1-initiated PAI-1 inductive response. In contrast to EGFR pathway blockade, interference with Rho/ROCK signaling effectively inhibited TGF-βR-mediated SMAD2 phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation. TGF-β1-stimulated SMAD2 activation, moreover, was not sufficient to induce PAI-1 expression in the absence of EGFR signaling both in VSMC and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Thus, two distinct pathways involving the EGFR/pp60c-src/MEK-ERK pathway and Rho/ROCK-dependent SMAD2 activation are required for TGF-β1-induced PAI-1 expression in VSMC. The identification of such novel interactions between two TGF-β1-activated signaling networks that specifically impact PAI-1 transcription in VSMC may provide therapeutically-relevant targets to manage the pathophysiology of PAI-1-associated cardiovascular/fibrotic diseases.

Keywords: Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, PAI-1, TGF-β, Vascular smooth muscle cells, Rho/ROCK signaling, EGFR, SMAD

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-2828(07)01349-1

doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.12.006

Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
Volume 44, Issue 3 , Pages 527-538, March 2008